One of the usages: expresses object/compliment?? clause with ‘that’ but only when the subjects of the superordinate and the participle clause are different: S1 V1 that S2 V2 and S1 V1 that S2 V2 Object.

Participle Intransitive

S1 V1 that S2 V2

Subject Participle Analysis Negation
I tunga tu - that do; nga - I -nngitsunga
You tutit tu - that do; tit - You
It tuq tu - that do; q - It -nngitsoq
We tugut tu - that do; gut - we)
You tusi tu - that do; si - you pl
They tut tu - that do; t - they -nngitsut 
  <thead>
    <tr>
      
        <th>Example                      </th>
      
        <th> Translation                                    </th>
      
        <th> Analysis     </th>
      
        <th> Notes                                             </th>
      
    </tr>
  </thead>





  <tbody>
    <tr>
      
        <td>Oqarpunga sulisutit.         </td>
      
        <td> I said that you work(ed).                      </td>
      
        <td> suli &#43; tutit </td>
      
        <td> t of the participle is meeting the vowel [i] -&gt; s </td>
      
    </tr>
  </tbody>





  <tbody>
    <tr>
      
        <td>Oqarpoq sulitunga.           </td>
      
        <td> He/she/it said that I work.                    </td>
      
        <td>              </td>
      
        <td>                                                   </td>
      
    </tr>
  </tbody>





  <tbody>
    <tr>
      
        <td>Oqarpoq oqanngitsut.         </td>
      
        <td> He/she/it said that they said.                 </td>
      
        <td>              </td>
      
        <td>                                                   </td>
      
    </tr>
  </tbody>





  <tbody>
    <tr>
      
        <td>Oqarpoq illuqarniarnngitsut. </td>
      
        <td> He/she/it said that they will not have a house </td>
      
        <td>              </td>
      
        <td>                                                   </td>
      
    </tr>
  </tbody>